3d Movies Criticized And Analyzed
3D movies domination in the modern movie industry is plain to see to anyone nowadays. A great percentage of movies are released in 3D format today, and thats probably nothing but a natural stage of evolution. Thats a win-win situation: absolutely cleaning up at the box office for the movie makers and unforgettable new visual experiences for the audience.
Nevertheless, tech stores report that 3D TV sets are by no means the bestsellers. Apparently, people dont want to watch 3D movies at home, although enjoy it in the cinema. Lets dwell upon this issue and try to figure it out.
Needless to say, 3D is awesome in a way. 3D movies cant be compared with regular ones in terms of effects, and thats an unquestionable truth. Jokes aside, who would be impressed by dull boring image on the screen after seeing all those unbelievable monsters and battles in 3D movies?. All in all, 3D is the most sophisticated movie technique by now.
Most 3D movies were really impressive and good. But this is some cons involved as well; thus, 3D is quite an old technique. What the developers did is upgraded it to make a quick buck. Thats the reason why some 3D movies really make peoples eyes bleed. The result is quite a pity: dark, blurry image, sour eyes, and headache.
Regardless of the plot, scenes, and cast, some movies are really better to be made in the traditional way. Some movies are really destined to be released in 3D, while others are just not worth it. But no one cares about that as long as there is a prospect of making tons of money during the very first weeks after the release. Experiences have shown that such experiments often fail.
Huh, finding the answers to the questions is harder than it seems to be. Supposedly, the answers are to be searched and found not in the limelight of the technology, but in the contents of the movies released in 3D. The bottom line is, good movie does not need to be stuffed with cool effects in order to stay cool. Dont be a simpleton and try to consider old good flat movies alongside with hot 3D ones. Cinematography is still the matter of taste, you know...
Nevertheless, tech stores report that 3D TV sets are by no means the bestsellers. Apparently, people dont want to watch 3D movies at home, although enjoy it in the cinema. Lets dwell upon this issue and try to figure it out.
Needless to say, 3D is awesome in a way. 3D movies cant be compared with regular ones in terms of effects, and thats an unquestionable truth. Jokes aside, who would be impressed by dull boring image on the screen after seeing all those unbelievable monsters and battles in 3D movies?. All in all, 3D is the most sophisticated movie technique by now.
Most 3D movies were really impressive and good. But this is some cons involved as well; thus, 3D is quite an old technique. What the developers did is upgraded it to make a quick buck. Thats the reason why some 3D movies really make peoples eyes bleed. The result is quite a pity: dark, blurry image, sour eyes, and headache.
Regardless of the plot, scenes, and cast, some movies are really better to be made in the traditional way. Some movies are really destined to be released in 3D, while others are just not worth it. But no one cares about that as long as there is a prospect of making tons of money during the very first weeks after the release. Experiences have shown that such experiments often fail.
Huh, finding the answers to the questions is harder than it seems to be. Supposedly, the answers are to be searched and found not in the limelight of the technology, but in the contents of the movies released in 3D. The bottom line is, good movie does not need to be stuffed with cool effects in order to stay cool. Dont be a simpleton and try to consider old good flat movies alongside with hot 3D ones. Cinematography is still the matter of taste, you know...