Was There 100 Eyewitnesses to Jesus" Resurrection?
While I was watching one of my Christian documentaries, another intelligence leader for the cause, made this statement," There were at least 100 eyewitnesses to the resurrection of Jesus.
" My only question is do we have any eyewitnesses to support these eyewitnesses? If I was in a federal court and the judge asked me about the eyewitnesses at Jesus' resurrection, I would have to make this statement," I can't provide any eyewitnesses.
" The federal judge would probably respond to me with something like this," Then this case is closed.
" If I don't have any eyewitnesses, I wouldn't have a court case or it would be extremely difficult to prove my point.
With that said, I would like to point something out to the man that made this statement and everyone else who believed him.
How do you really know that there were any eyewitnesses or that Jesus was ever resurrected? It's bad enough to run around telling everyone that Jesus was resurrected without providing any proof, but to tell everyone that there were over 100 eyewitnesses, is another story.
It's almost like one lie followed by another lie.
If you don't have the facts or the evidence to support claims like this, you shouldn't have the right to tell people that they actually happened.
How can you possibly tell anyone that something happened, when you don't have any evidence to support your claims? We might not ever know the truth, but I'm sick and tired of people running around telling other people that stuff like this actually happened.
When are we going to accept the facts and stop listening to the hearsay? The facts are simple to Christians get overly complicated to individuals looking for satisfactory scientific evidence to support the claims they are making.
I remember a movie, where someone said," Show me the money.
" If they ever make a movie about me, I would like to say," Just show me the proof.
"
" My only question is do we have any eyewitnesses to support these eyewitnesses? If I was in a federal court and the judge asked me about the eyewitnesses at Jesus' resurrection, I would have to make this statement," I can't provide any eyewitnesses.
" The federal judge would probably respond to me with something like this," Then this case is closed.
" If I don't have any eyewitnesses, I wouldn't have a court case or it would be extremely difficult to prove my point.
With that said, I would like to point something out to the man that made this statement and everyone else who believed him.
How do you really know that there were any eyewitnesses or that Jesus was ever resurrected? It's bad enough to run around telling everyone that Jesus was resurrected without providing any proof, but to tell everyone that there were over 100 eyewitnesses, is another story.
It's almost like one lie followed by another lie.
If you don't have the facts or the evidence to support claims like this, you shouldn't have the right to tell people that they actually happened.
How can you possibly tell anyone that something happened, when you don't have any evidence to support your claims? We might not ever know the truth, but I'm sick and tired of people running around telling other people that stuff like this actually happened.
When are we going to accept the facts and stop listening to the hearsay? The facts are simple to Christians get overly complicated to individuals looking for satisfactory scientific evidence to support the claims they are making.
I remember a movie, where someone said," Show me the money.
" If they ever make a movie about me, I would like to say," Just show me the proof.
"