Online Article Submission Sites and Keyword Stuffing Rules - Conflicts in Content Considered
Some top online article directory sites frown heavily on article marketers that keyword stuff so heavy handedly that the articles almost do not make any sense.
Therefore they've had no choice but to make rules on keyword density, can you blame them, as obviously these rules are due to the obvious abuse from article authors writing for article marketers, or article writer-marketers trying to game the search engines.
Now the search engines are on to this and often discount such content online, lowering the rankings, and that is really bad news for an online article directory site, and its community of authors.
Still, there is really no reason to key word stuff if you have a good thesaurus, because you can use replacement words, which will assist in taking advantage of the long-tail theory, which is probably just as good in the long-run anyway.
Unfortunately, knowing all this some article marketers are again working around these rules for specific word density in the articles and now use programs that go in, and modify words with a Thesaurus Replacement type program, and then post the same article over and over again - only changing around sentences, adverbs, nouns and verbs.
Worse, these folks hire people in third world nations, pay them peanuts, then take their articles and turn one article they bought for $3 and make it into 10-versions.
They do this to fill up categories and basically flood the Internet with content under their specific niches.
To make it worse, the article is not written by them, it was written by someone from perhaps India, and/or a computer.
Why is this a problem? What's wrong with Artificial Intelligence creating content, isn't that just a tool for Internet Entrepreneurs? Sure, but the articles are basically junk and replicated nothingness.
So, it does not serve the reader, internet, directory depository, or humanity for that matter.
But these writings are able to get around the key-word density rules set up by the content library type sites.
Thus, the rules created to stop cheating and increase quality are hurting the honest authors and the manipulators have merely modified their behavior, tactics and computer programs to exploit the rules and dominate their competition online.
As I watch these things unfold, I often laugh at the absurdity of it all and those who believe we can make rules to enforce morality on the Internet.
But on a side note, I find it alarming because competing against cheaters is a lot like my old days in Track and Field competing against those that took steroids.
I could beat them, but I had to work out three times as hard; it made me realize, I really do not like laziness, cheaters or manipulators.
Perhaps you will think on this, because quite frankly, I just getting tired of it.
Therefore they've had no choice but to make rules on keyword density, can you blame them, as obviously these rules are due to the obvious abuse from article authors writing for article marketers, or article writer-marketers trying to game the search engines.
Now the search engines are on to this and often discount such content online, lowering the rankings, and that is really bad news for an online article directory site, and its community of authors.
Still, there is really no reason to key word stuff if you have a good thesaurus, because you can use replacement words, which will assist in taking advantage of the long-tail theory, which is probably just as good in the long-run anyway.
Unfortunately, knowing all this some article marketers are again working around these rules for specific word density in the articles and now use programs that go in, and modify words with a Thesaurus Replacement type program, and then post the same article over and over again - only changing around sentences, adverbs, nouns and verbs.
Worse, these folks hire people in third world nations, pay them peanuts, then take their articles and turn one article they bought for $3 and make it into 10-versions.
They do this to fill up categories and basically flood the Internet with content under their specific niches.
To make it worse, the article is not written by them, it was written by someone from perhaps India, and/or a computer.
Why is this a problem? What's wrong with Artificial Intelligence creating content, isn't that just a tool for Internet Entrepreneurs? Sure, but the articles are basically junk and replicated nothingness.
So, it does not serve the reader, internet, directory depository, or humanity for that matter.
But these writings are able to get around the key-word density rules set up by the content library type sites.
Thus, the rules created to stop cheating and increase quality are hurting the honest authors and the manipulators have merely modified their behavior, tactics and computer programs to exploit the rules and dominate their competition online.
As I watch these things unfold, I often laugh at the absurdity of it all and those who believe we can make rules to enforce morality on the Internet.
But on a side note, I find it alarming because competing against cheaters is a lot like my old days in Track and Field competing against those that took steroids.
I could beat them, but I had to work out three times as hard; it made me realize, I really do not like laziness, cheaters or manipulators.
Perhaps you will think on this, because quite frankly, I just getting tired of it.